Targeting technical assistance

Research by ActionAid reveals that rich countries’ ‘technical assistance’ (TA) – consultants, research and training – often promotes the interests of rich countries and inappropriate solutions instead of alleviating poverty.

Spending on western consultancies forms a major part of TA. In the UK, for example, almost half of TA spending goes on consultants and other experts, the vast majority to British companies.

Expatriate consultants typically cost around $200,000 a year - more than one third of this is spent on school fees and child allowances. This spending would not be needed if local consultants were used, plus they bring an invaluable understanding of local culture.

In Cambodia, for example, consultants fees were $17,000 a month while government salaries were only $40. In Ghana, even relatively inexperienced consultants earned per day what government officials earned in a month. In Sierra Leone, according to one former UK-funded consultant, daily take-home pay was the same as the Auditor General’s monthly salary.

What is ActionAid calling for?
ActionAid believes that there needs to be radical reform of the way that donors provide Technical Assistance. In particular:

  • rich countries must stop trying to control poor countries through the use of TA, but instead let them determine their own pathways to development.
  • poor countries must have much more choice over how TA funds are spent. They must be given the option of spending aid money on their own poverty reduction or capacity building priorities, rather than expensive western consultants.
  • rich countries must stop assuming that western experts have better ideas about reducing poverty than those experiencing poverty first hand.

photo : ©Warrick Page/Panos Pictures/ActionAid

Join target poverty

back to page navigation


Useful Links